🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced positive results. One writer who changed both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."